• VitaMaskar
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    If there's logic here, I can't find it. You have to assume symmetry.
    15/11/2018 à 22:22
  • sankai
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Completely logical and solvable without assuming symmetry.

    @VitaMaskar if you want to try:
    On the first line you can think what would happen, if you put the 7 at the c1-7 and what it implies on line 2.
    If so, then line 2 will have c1-3 and c5, while you can't put anything on c4 and c6-7 (X). This means, that the second 3 on line 2 can not be set in this setting(as long as line 1 c4 is filled).
    Hence line 1 c1-4 are not fillable (X).
    You can repeat the same at the end and you'll have the first line filled :)

    If you have difficulties imagining it, you can start and try with temporaries - with enough training you won't have to use them anymore.
    15/11/2018 à 23:24
  • smokeygold
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Thought it was a new category, thanks for the hanjie.
    15/11/2018 à 23:41
  • Strigoii
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Fully logical (with or without assuming symmetry). Good image. Thank you for the puzzle!
    16/11/2018 à 04:14
  • mmartin
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Thank you.
    16/11/2018 à 04:36
  • kimon
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Nice image. Fully logical.
    16/11/2018 à 13:26
  • AlienAfterlife
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Nice one, cool.
    16/11/2018 à 14:59
  • iggie23
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Thanks.
    18/11/2018 à 08:07
  • Pazurumasuta
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Good one.. Had no trouble figuring this out.
    09/10/2019 à 19:08
  • Rudi_Raetsellos
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    100% logical. No trouble. It IS symmetrical, but you do not need to assume that to solve it.
    Thanks.
    15/10/2019 à 18:58