• KJourneaux
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Had to give up. Too much guessing involved.
    13/01/2013 à 16:54
  • drceit
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Phew, that was hard! It is worth keeping on trying. There are only 3 guesses: The first is easy, concerning the location of the 5 in the top row, and can be worked out by trying it in the two possible locations. The second double guess is where to put the 2 final dots, but then, snakes eyes...
    13/01/2013 à 21:57
  • drceit
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Plus it is a very beautiful design. Well done.
    13/01/2013 à 21:58
  • chrisjt
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Took a long time but it is ALMOST completely logical. The last two dots can be put in two different ways.
    13/01/2013 à 22:26
  • swford
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    That was fun and totally worth the effort. Yep, last 2 dots are a guess. (Not a biggie)
    30/01/2013 à 16:15
  • mystifier
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Don't be put off. Minor guess for last two squares. Great puzzle.
    31/05/2016 à 14:09
  • Strigoii
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Started off a bit slow, but sped up after using some temporaries to determine x's. A nice challenge. Thank you!
    21/09/2016 à 05:14
  • hjaw123
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Cute puzzle, I found it much easier to solve once I worked out where the fours in the outside columns and rows went.
    30/01/2017 à 04:34
  • Alesko
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    I can confirm is completely logical up to last 4 squares (2 dots). Nice one.
    08/06/2018 à 12:06
  • Sena10
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Hard, but logical. Only the last for dots need some easy guessing. Congrats.
    16/07/2018 à 01:12
  • Damask_
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Thank you.
    03/12/2019 à 03:12