• elmcot
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Thanks!
    22/11/2017 à 16:32
  • rinko
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Pretty uninteresting picture, and was that even logically solvable?
    22/11/2017 à 17:40
  • valJEANVAL
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    It can only be solved by temporaries/guess and check. Sometimes you have to follow the chain a long time before you reach a contradiction and have to go back. This is not the kind of puzzle that is usually played.
    22/11/2017 à 18:44
  • Strigoii
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Seems fully logical. Thank you for the puzzle.
    22/11/2017 à 22:15
  • Rudi_Raetsellos
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Same here 'ValJEANVAL'.
    22/11/2017 à 22:32
  • ppglaf
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Fully logical.
    23/11/2017 à 13:24
  • Sparks
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    No guessing needed.
    23/11/2017 à 18:36
  • KittyKaity
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Fully logical, tip if you get stuck, compare the structure of the bottom two rows to see where the columns can rise on the right side, given the restriction to 1 & 2 of the column widths from the 7 on the bottom row.
    24/12/2017 à 09:27
  • Hydrazoid
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Yeah, didn't expect to need 2 dimensional logic on a small hanjie like this one, but you can't advance without it.
    31/01/2018 à 04:11