• bloggsy88
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Very cute.
    31/05/2013 à 08:34
  • minimint
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Ok, I've got five out of the 7, one from the nine, and then what?
    Am I missing something, or has my brain been totally drained by our rare sunshine today?
    31/05/2013 à 22:09
  • dragoncarine
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Use temp mode to find 9, then it's easy.
    01/06/2013 à 20:51
  • swford
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    **SPOILER ALERT**
    I wouldn't exactly say this was "easy."
    I took a SWAG and centered the 9 squares in the bottom row. It worked! I hope that helps.
    02/06/2013 à 20:28
  • valJEANVAL
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    For future reference @Rattygap: put a completely black row at the bottom and that will allow the solver to find the proper location of the "9" clue without guessing.
    03/06/2013 à 17:00
  • valJEANVAL
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    Oh, I see it now, it's second-order logic. You have to consider some horizontal and vertical clues simultaneously. The logic is like this: You know that the center square of the bottom row is part of the "9" clue. If the 9 squares are too far to the left or too far to the right, it becomes impossible to satisfy the "3" clues row just above the bottom due to the presence of several "2" in the bottom of several of the columns. So there's only one possible positioning of the 9.
    03/06/2013 à 17:05
  • littlebitocd
    Voir la traduction Voir la version originale
    If you nail down the 9 in the bottom row with 2d logic, everything else is logical, no guessing or temps needed.
    15/01/2018 à 23:41